GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Books

All-Time High Scores
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005
Best Of 2004
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Books In Our Forums

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed books.

 

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

How Doctors Think
by Jerome Groopman

How Doctors Think reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 79 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.0 out of 10
based on 12 reviews
read critic reviews
how did we calculate this?
based on 1 vote
read user comments
rate this book

Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and one of the world's leading researchers in cancer and AIDS, Dr. Groopman breaks down the forces and thought processes behind the decisions doctors make. He explores why doctors err and shows when and how they can -- with our help -- avoid snap judgments, embrace uncertainty, communicate effectively, and deploy other skills that can profoundly impact our health.

Houghton Mifflin Company, 320 pages
03/19/2007
$26.00

ISBN: 0618610030

Nonfiction
Health & Medicine

What The Critics Said

All reviews are classified as one of five grades: Outstanding (4 points), Favorable (3), Mixed (2), Unfavorable (1) and Terrible (0). To calculate the Metascore, we divide total points achieved by the total points possible (i.e., 4 x the number of reviews), with the resulting percentage (multiplied by 100) being the Metascore. Learn more...

Publishers Weekly Perri Klass
This passionate honesty gives the book an immediacy and an eloquence that will resonate with anyone interested in medicine, science or the cruel beauties of those human endeavors which engage mortal stakes.
Read Full Review
Kirkus Reviews
A highly pleasurable must-read. [15 Jan 2007, p.62]
The New York Times Book Review Michael Crichton
It is this direct and honest voice that drives the narratives of this remarkable book. Here is Groopman at the peak of his form, as a physician and as a writer. Readers will relish the result.
Read Full Review
The Globe And Mail [Toronto] Vincent Lam
The great beauty of this book is in Groopman's elegant discourse on the journey of medical thinking.
Read Full Review
Wall Street Journal Thomas Hager
In this book he pulls off the admirable hat trick of demystifying medicine, giving patients the tools they need to improve their dealings with healthcare professionals, and challenging readers to examine their own assumptions about the medical world.
Read Full Review
Washington Post David Brown
[Groopman's] task is to offer practical advice to both patients and physicians. He succeeds at both. Groopman catalogues the many species of clinical errors, a whole taxonomy of misperceptions and wrong conclusions illustrated with real examples offered as representative types. All are fascinating, a few are chilling.
Read Full Review
The New York Times William Grimes
A series of illuminating essays that explore the rational and irrational factors that influence medical decision-making. By turns inspiring and dismaying.
Read Full Review
Los Angeles Times David Kessler
Groopman's writing style grabs the reader's attention by making his characters come alive on the page — so much so, in fact, that the reader truly cares about the medical dilemmas they are facing. He gives us more information about the patients than most books of this genre, so that we can follow the doctors' thinking and understand how their decisions are made.
Read Full Review
Booklist Ray Olson
A book to restore faith in an often-resented profession. [1 Jan 2007, p.21]
Entertainment Weekly Gilbert Cruz
The flip side of Groopman's steadfast devotion to his topic, of course, is that he risks wearing down his reader with too many examples of how doctors can go wrong. It's enough to make the most carefree readers fear for their lives.
Read Full Review
Boston Globe Howard Markel
The examples of erroneous assumptions and logical lapses described need to be drilled into the head of every practicing physician. What the book does not fully address, and I think too many medical consumers refuse to contemplate, is the unsettling acceptance that mistakes are inimical to the practice of medicine.
Read Full Review
Chicago Sun-Times Jim Ritter
Unfortunately, the book reads less like his New Yorker essays and more like a succession of the TV series "House," in which the series star is a cranky medical genius who always pushes the envelope in employing risky but life-saving techniques on his patients with bizarre symptoms.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this book is 8.0 (out of 10) based on 1 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Patricia F gave it an8:
The book was very illuminating and provides insight into how a doctor might reach a correct or incorrect diagnosis. Having taught medical students, I know first-hand that none are saints and none of them knows everything--although some think they do. The book will help the lay person to understand why they should become involved in a dialogue with their doctor about his diagnosis and therapeutic approach. And, if in doubt, seek a second opinion.

Discuss this book in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use